Saturday, July 29, 2023

#52Ancestors #Week30 - In the News

 My great-great-great grandmother was in the news, only once that I can tell.  She or someone in the family reported that she had been assaulted and the newspaper printed the details. I don't wish to speculate about what may have happened to my ancestor, but there are undoubtedly embellishments included in the colorful newspaper report. There doesn't ever appear to have been a follow up apprehension of the correct "fiend", at least not one that rated mention in the paper, and I hope that no one met with the likely punishment of the time. I have misplaced the year that this took place but based on her age, this was in about 1885.

Assaulted by a Negro

Mrs. Pearson, an aged woman, Cruelly Outraged by the Fiend

Cairo, ILL, Feb 3 - Special Telegram - 

News reached this city this morning of a Horrible outrage perpetrated near America [Illinois], just above Mound City, a few days ago. Mrs. Nancy Pearson, a highly respected White woman about 60 years old, was assaulted by an unknown negro and cruelly outraged and Abused. Grave fears are entertained of her Recovery. The whole country is aroused over the occurance, and an active search is being made for the perpetrator. The only clue so far obtained is that after assaulting Mrs. Pearson, the fiend robbed her of all the money he could find, $1.90. One of the coins was a fifty-cent piece that had been worn very smooth and had a nick in one side. This she described and is was found to have been passed at Huckleberry's stationery store for a purchase made by a negro, whom Huckleberry said he would know again if he saw him. Several suspects have been arrested, but so far the right one has not been found.

Nancy Pearson was a fairly recent widow, and $1.90 was a great deal of money in 1885, worth between $60-65 today. If she was greviously injured, she did well and lived another 20 years. However, both Cairo and Mound City were both "sundown towns" and Cairo was the site of several documented lynchings, including that of one white man. This was no idle accusation. Given the culture of racism in Little Egypt, I'm grateful that - this time - this didn't become a larger news story, not missing that accusations (or their published embellishments), large and small, damaged countless lives. 


Tuesday, July 25, 2023

#52Ancestors, Week 30: Nettie in the News

Reading about your relatives in the newspapers can be quite disconcerting.  Of course, there are the tame social visits, marriage announcements, anniversaries, etc., but sometimes, the not-so-palatable side can be revealed.  In this instance, don't despair!  Consider how often you've heard some variation on the advice, "Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see."  At the same time, though, "Where there's smoke, there's fire" is also a credible adage.  Personally, I think it's important to remember that there are always two sides (often more) to a story.  I did my best to allow for both sides in the case of an oft-mentioned aunt, Nettie (Pearson) McClure Hudson Miller Reed Johnson. Allow me to elucidate.

Nettie, you may remember, is a member of the Nobody-Knows-About tribe, but there are some details about which I am quite certain.  Detail #1:  Nettie was married more than was typical...for any time period.  I have been able to prove 5 marriages, but it's possible there were more.  Detail #2: Nettie was not a demure wife. This information comes almost entirely from divorce proceedings that found their way into the local newspapers. 

If Nettie was properly divorced from her first two husbands, Elmer McClure and Roy Hudson, I haven't found any documentation for it.  There is, however, a record for Nettie's divorce from Walter Miller. The cause of the divorce? Cruelty.  When I found the divorce decree, I assumed Walter was the guilty party...but apparently not. The newspaper article below details alarming accusations of Nettie threatening physical harm.  Guns, knives, and hot grease are all mentioned.   

Dec. 8, 1933

Later that same month, though, the following article was found concerning Walter.  

Dec. 21, 1933

So, Walter was stealing electricity while also running an illegal still.  Furthermore, he was potentially stealing from the railroad. It seems unlikely that all this had transpired in the 13 days since he was granted the divorce. In that case, can we make the argument that Nettie's cruelty was understandable (though perhaps not justifiable)?  Was it a response to Walter's illegal activities?  

Her track record certainly didn't improve.  Just four months into her next marriage, husband Walter Reed filed for divorce.  Again, Nettie was charged with cruelty.  This time, though, it was more mental than physical.  According to article, Nettie taunted Walter and also destroyed his clothes.

Jan. 29, 1935

This divorce was not granted, but Walter tried again 4 years later.  The charge was still cruelty, but it sounds more like Walter was embarrassed by his wife's behavior.  She wasn't comporting herself like "a proper lady. " Uncomfortable perhaps, but how exactly does it constitute cruelty?

July 8, 1939

In any case, this time, the divorce was granted.  Nettie was married again by the 1940 census, but I haven't found any indication of how or why that marriage ended.  

As far as these clippings go, I'm not sure what to think about Nettie.  She and Walter Miller were married for 15 years, so something must have precipitated her violent behavior.  I feel compelled to lay the blame at Walter's feet, but they were probably both guilty of a lack of concern for each other.  And while most of what Walter Reed accused her of was unfeeling and improper, I don't think it can be rightly categorized as cruelty.  I suppose "callous behavior" wasn't grounds for divorce.

Where am I going with all this?  I guess my point is that, while Nettie is painted in a very unflattering light, her husbands probably weren't saints.  What we are given in these articles is someone's version of the truth, but as Potiphar says, "Don't believe everything you read, dear."  (Name that musical!)



Thursday, July 20, 2023

#52Ancestors #Week29 Happy Birthday to Phil


Happy Birthday!

I've learned over the years of research that immigrants (and other individuals that didn't always know their dates of birth) often chose January 1st or The Fourth of July as their preferred date, the latter being especially popular with those wishing to show their loyalty to their country.

My 3rd great-grandfather Philip Pfeffer chose January 1st, and the year of his birth seems to be 1854, although I have little in the way of confirmation of this. The man is said to have emigrated from Germany (then Prussia) to the U.S. as a 12 year old stowaway, placing his arrival shortly after the end of the Civil War. No arrival record has been found, which makes it unreasonably difficult to ascertain his origins, the names of his parents, or his actual date of birth. It's certainly possible that he was born at the dawn of the new year, but...

I have no reliable indication of him residing in the U.S until his 1874 marriage in Illinois, although I do have documentation of relatives in Indiana and Kentucky prior to this date. Without proof of any of the relevant parents of three men in three different states (Philip did reside in Kentucky, and later Missouri), after several decades I still do not know their relationship to each other, but they were definitely intimately involved in one another's lives. Whatever the case, I can imagine these men, in their new land, enjoying a winter holiday free from most chores, perhaps giving thanks for the new year at Mass, and maybe a special treat baked for the man who was a year older that day, although in Victorian times, the Pfeffers earlier years in Kentucky predated the “Happy Birthday” song.

Philip’s date of birth, chosen or not, is only recorded in the St. Henry Catholic Church (Charleston, MO) records from shortly before his death. He was only able to celebrate 45 years before he left his wife and children, possibly to some form of what was then called brain fever. He was buried near the Mississippi River, far from the rest of his family (but possibly with one infant daughter). As of this writing, his grave has never been marked with the dates of his life, something I would like to do one day.

We do have an excellent remembrance of him in a photo that is now approximately 130 years old, and has been passed down to me.  I think I may need to begin offering a toast to my progenitor on the 170th anniversary of his birth this winter!

Wednesday, July 19, 2023

#52Ancestors, Week 29, No First Birthday

Birthdays are a time for celebrating another revolution around the sun, but as the saying goes, "growing old is a privilege denied to many."  This was probably even more true in the days before advanced medicine.  A dozen children might be born to one set of parents, but it was rare that all 12 would live to adulthood.  Childhood diseases (and the occasional accident) took many a young life. It's hard to know just how many, though, because mandated reporting of deaths didn't start until the 1900s.  Family cemeteries, if they still exist, are sometimes the only indicator of a brief life.  I am fortunate that my ancestors, the Pearsons, kept a family cemetery and placed markers to recognize the loss of young children.  This post is dedicated to four little babies who didn't get to celebrate a single birthday.

Joseph Allen Pearson and Nancy Ann Fields had (at least) 10 children between 1848 and 1872.  One of them was my great great grandfather, George William Pearson, and one of them was Cuzzin Heather's great great great grandmother, Elizabeth Pearson. 4 others lived to adulthood: Thomas, Mary Ann, Nancy, and Mattie. The remaining 4 (John, Catherine, Joseph, and Lila) didn't reach the age of 1.  These children will be remembered primarily thanks to a group of people in Pulaski County, Illinois, who decided to transcribe the local cemeteries in a series of volumes titled Where They Sleep: Cemetery Inscriptions of Pulaski County, published in 1993.

John M. Pearson's stone in what is left of Pearson Cemetery

John M. Pearson was born June 22, 1849.  I'm sure he was born to much fanfare, as he was the first son.  (His sister, Elizabeth, had been born the previous year.) Because of the timing of his death, John is enumerated on the 1850 Mortality Schedule.  It is indicated that he died of croup, a common childhood malady. John lived 8 months and 4 days, dying on February 26, 1850.  His mother, Nancy, was already pregnant with another child, Catherine.

Catherine's headstone

Sadly, Catherine wouldn't live to see her first birthday either.  Her headstone reads:
Catherine Pearson
d/J.A. & N.A. Pearson
b. 5 Nov 1850
d. 28 Mar 1851
age 0-4-23
It is unknown what the poor mite died of, but I'm certain her mother was absolutely heartbroken.  This time, she couldn't even comfort herself with the possibility of another child.  The next recorded birth for Nancy wouldn't be for another 2 years.  In the meantime, Elizabeth - born 1848 - remained Joseph and Nancy's only living child.

Two more girls would arrive, Nancy and Mary Ann, before the advent of another son, Joseph L.  Any joy in his arrival was short-lived, however. Joseph wouldn't even see out his first month.  He was born on July 13, 1857, and he died on August 6th.  Were it not for Where They Sleep, no knowledge of Joseph would remain.  It has been 30 years since the volunteers recorded the cemetery inscriptions, and Joseph's stone has since been consumed by the cornfield in which the tiny cemetery resides.

My great great grandfather was born next, and he would be the first male to survive infancy.  Next came another son, Thomas J.  He was born in 1862, survived childhood, but disappears some time in the late 1800s.  Mattie, a daughter, would follow.  Joseph and Nancy's final child was a girl, Lila O. Pearson, but she would not be the baby of the family for long. Again, Where They Sleep is the only documentation of her existence.  Her inscription simply reads:
Lila O. Pearson
b. 27 Oct 1872
d. 6 July 1873
Her stone has succumbed to the cornfield, too.

In memory of John, Catherine, Joseph, and Lila Pearson
Sweet babies gone, but not forgotten


Friday, July 14, 2023

#52Ancestors #Week28 - Random?

In spite of working very hard so that most of my entries are either about our Pearson relatives in Pulaski County, Illinois, or at least peripherally related to them, I can't do that this time.

Instead of a random fact about a family member, what we have here is a completely "random" family member, my husband's biological father George, who passed away ten years ago. Given the number of things I've learned about George since he passed, I'm quite certain he had at least one very serious mental illness, and definitely deep alcoholism: "Daddy, why is Grandpa having beer with breakfast?"

My husband was raised by his mother and his step-father, and what he knew about his biological father consisted of his name and his origin in Wisconsin, information that was on his birth certificate and his military paperwork. He also knew that his parents were married, and the divorce occured before 1973, when his mother remarried. No memory of the actual person, and no photos at all.

My poor husband dated and married a genealogist, so we had been dating several months and had discussed George a time or three, when I asked Hubz if he would like to know more or possibly meet his biological dad. He said yes.  This was in the very early 90's, so as I recall, he asked his mother if she knew names of his grandparents or where they might live and she answered. We called directory assistance with their name and received a phone number for his grandmother.

We called her, and that woman couldn't have been more thrilled to be talking to her grandson. Her husband had passed away more than 15 years earlier, but she and George, and her other children were all alive and well. Lots of aunts and uncles and cousins. I don't recall whether or not there were phone calls with George right away, but it was March when we went to Wisconsin to meet him. One of the first things we learned upon meeting George was that Hubz has two younger siblings, a brother (M) and a sister (K). They live a few additional states away, but the pictures of the teenage brother are a dead ringer for my husband (many years later we would find that our youngest daughter is a bit of a doppelganger for her aunt). 

We went back the following summer and made a habit of it in following years on the weekend of Hubz birthday. That first summer visit, we took the older kids (who were just littles at the time) and met the above-mentioned brother and sister. One night when we were all gathered around the fire pit outside, Hubz asked George who the blonde man on the other side of him was (no ceremony there, they hadn't been introduced). George pointed his thumb and the man "Oh, that's your brother, R!" Turned out, almost three years older than Dan, and I found out fairly recently that R's mother the best friend of George's mother. 

Then, 10 years ago when George was dying, he told Hubz that there were probably going to be more siblings for him to meet in his future. Based on info from George, Hubz then discovered his next youngest brother, S.  George and the mother had been married briefly in the 70's, both S and his mother are now deceased, but Hubz has been able to meet one of his nieces.

Then DNA arrived on the scene.... I first asked Hubz if there were something I might need to know about the name in front of me, and he had no idea. I triangulated as many "shared matches" as I could and involved my daughter in looking at them to see if we could figure out who we were looking at. Soon, I messaged the match, a close relative on Hubz paternal side, close in age to our daughter, and there were no replies.

We genealogists don't like non-answers, generally. I messaged again, although it was probably 6 months later, and this time I got a response. Mr. DNA sample has a mom from Wisconsin who just happens to live near US, and she is Hubz sister. C was raised by adoptive parents, and Hubz soon met her (at a city park during COVID), along with her older son, who just happens to be a dead ringer for Hubz, and later we took her to Wisconsin to meet the extended family. Pictures have been copied and shared and on the same visit, we also met her mother and sister. Briefly, we thought the older sister was also progeny of George, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

For now, there are 6. George and 4 of the five mothers from the above narrative are all deceased.  Especially when we were in Wisconsin with sister C, we heard a lot of new stories about George's life that none of us had known, and my conclusion is that for someone that had an exceptionally challenging start in a very small town, he certainly (to borrow a turn of phrase from our daughter) "left his mark" on the world.



Tuesday, July 11, 2023

#52Ancestors, Week 28, A Random Discovery

Sometimes a search for the mundane reveals a startling event.  Sometimes that event makes sense in the context of a situation, and sometimes...it doesn't make sense in the context of any situation! 

The subject of this week's prompt (Random) is one Roy Hudson.  Roy is what I guess you might call a peripheral relative.  He was briefly married to my great grandfather's sister, Nettie, but their marriage did not produce any children.  Ancestry simply labels him as "husband of great grand aunt." My random discovery occurred when I tried to find legal documentation of the termination of their marriage.

If you want a bit of background on Nettie, it might help to read my previous post concerning her multiple marriages. All you need to know about Roy, though, is that Nettie married him in Caruthersville, Missouri, in 1915, but on January 10, 1918, Nettie married her third husband, Walter Miller.  In my attempt to uncover a documented divorce for Nettie and Roy, I instead stumbled upon something that can only be described as completely random...and totally bizarre.

Alton Evening Telegraph
January 5, 1918



Alton Evening Telegraph
January 10, 1918

So...5 days before Nettie's 3rd marriage, Roy Hudson's clothes (minus socks and shoes) and a few personal effects (oh, how I want to know if something was written on that card!) are found beneath a fishing dock in Alton, Illinois.  On the day of Nettie's marriage to her third husband, Roy's father contacts the police and, according to the article's byline, reveals that Roy is missing from home.  Throw in the man who tries to claim Roy's clothes, and you've got a humdinger of a what-the-heck-is-going-on-here?!

I wish I knew.  Here's what I do know.  While the article suggests a possible suicide, this is not Roy's fate.  By the 1920 census, he has remarried and is living in East St. Louis with his new wife.  He dies of pulmonary tuberculosis in 1929.

As I have never found a follow-up article concerning Roy, I have a few hypotheses concerning this most unusual disappearance:

1.  Clearly, Nettie had found someone new.  Maybe Roy was beside himself. It is possible that Roy contemplated suicide down by the river, disrobed, and - as the second article suggests - found the water far too cold for such activities. If that was the case, though, why didn't he put his clothes back on?!

2.  Various articles concerning Nettie, as well as later divorce documents, indicate she had a violent streak.  Maybe she and Roy had already separated (there is no indication as to whose home he was missing from), but he wanted to make sure that he cut ties with her completely.  Clearly, this wasn't a suicide, but maybe he wanted it to look like a suicide.

3.  Stay with me, here.  Is it possible that Roy and Nettie planned this deception?  I don't know what was necessary for a divorce in this era and area.  Maybe it was simpler to fake a death than it was to obtain a divorce?  If so, Nettie certainly didn't wait long to take advantage of her 2nd husband's presumed demise.

4.  The man who tries to claim Roy's clothes?  Hard to say, but if hypothesis 2 or 3 is correct, Roy certainly couldn't claim the items himself.  Maybe he enlisted the help of a friend.

That's a whole lot of "maybes," and I doubt I will ever find the actual answer to why Roy Hudson's clothes randomly appeared beneath a fishing dock or why he randomly disappeared in January of 1918. As always, I will keep looking.


Monday, July 10, 2023

#52Ancestors, Week 27: The Great Outdoors (Water Edition)

Apologies for being a bit behind on this post.  A wonderful thing happened, and my little family drove almost all the way up to the great white north to visit...Cuzzin Heather!  We had a lovely visit, but it took us a while to recover from our road trip, and I was unable to complete last week's prompt on time.  So, without further ado, let me talk a bit about my great grandparents, both Pearson and Swanson.

My mother often tells me of the trips she and her family took to Minnesota when she was a little girl.  There are pictures upon pictures of my grandparents and my aunts and uncles holding strings of fish.  It wasn't until my grandfather passed and I received a large tote of pictures that I realized that his parents, my great grandma and grandpa Pearson, were also avid fisherpeople.


These pictures are all from the same trip to Fall Lake, MN.  The back of the pictures indicate that this was a May 1973 excursion and that on this particular day, Great Grandpa Ben and Great Grandma Lena caught the limit on walleye.  Great Grandpa is 84 and Great Grandma is 77. Look how proud they are!  While I hadn't really considered it before, I guess a love for fishing/the water makes sense for both of them. Great Grandma Lena grew up not far from Lake Michigan, and Great Grandpa Ben grew up by the Ohio River.  On top of that, fishing was another way to supplement family meals. I could really go for some fried walleye right about now...

My Swanson great grandparents were also lovers of the water. Below, you can see my Great Grandpa Oscar's brother, Harry, in his fishing boat.  Harry was also quite fond of sailing.  I believe he took the picture on the right.  The back reads, "It don't seem very long Oscar that I took this picture and brother Harold is just taking it easy that day.  He was the captain to all of us and I sure hope his family are all well."  Harold (not Harry) passed away in 1936; he is leaning up against the mast.  My Great Grandpa Oscar is on the right. This picture of the brothers (not sure who the man on the left is) enjoying the great outdoors seems to be a bittersweet memory for Harry.


Great Grandpa Oscar and Great Grandma Thelma grew up within spitting distance of the shores of Lake Michigan, and while I have pictures of them fishing (sometimes with my Pearson great grandparents), they also appeared to love the beach.  


I love this group photo that includes my great grandparents.  Grandpa Oscar is bottom right with his hat askew, and Grandma Thelma is in the center being hugged by another woman.  I cannot identify anyone else in this photo, but they are clearly having a good time!  I imagine they spent the day eating, talking, perhaps playing some games, and just generally enjoying their time together.  This particular photo does not indicate where the picture was taken, but the film was developed in LaCrosse, Wisconsin.  Looks like they have some pretty nice beaches there...

Sunday, July 9, 2023

#52Ancestors #Week27 - The Great Outdoors

No, Not the Cult Classic Movie of Memes: The Chamberlain family's adventuring!

I did not grow up in a household that hunted or fished. I did, though, grow up hiking in the real wilderness and tent-camping every summer from ages 8 - 18. LOTS of camping. Also, since my first summer, we stayed with my grandparents at two different Wisconsin cabins, playing croquet, swimming and most of all, FISHING! There was Muskie Camp with Chamberlain great-aunts and great-uncles, fabulous and fun folk, all! 

One of my favorite cabin memories was of the first summer my grandparents took my cousin and I, both age 4, to the cabin, and one of the things we looked forward to was roasting the giant pink and yellow marshmallows they'd bought as a treat. I remember the torrential rain that evening, and my grandpa dressing in his rain gear (looking like a sea captain) and going out to grill our marshmallows, near the kitchen window so that we could watch. They loved us so well.

It was very likely that same summer that we were 4 that Grandpa started teaching us about Ootie Bugs. What the What? you may ask! The cabin was just a short distance up the road from a sandstone outcropping, where we went frequently to play in the sand, carve in the sandstone (we were children, we followed what the adults were doing) and climb the little incline with Grandpa. In the sandy spots in the incline, sandflies made their homes and Grandpa taught is that if we shouted into the holes, the "Ooties" would come out!  So if you ever see two women in their 50's, one dark haired annd one fair, shouting into the sand, we are only remembering our Grandpa. And the "Sand-Pit" was decimated - condos are there now. Grandma made up her own little songs in order to teach us the names of all the animals. She loved entertaining little songs that she remembered from childhood, and made these up for us:

                    A deer, a deer, a daddy deer, what is it?

                    A Buck! we'd shout.

                    A deer, a deer, a mommy deer, what is it?

                    A doe! we'd shout.

                    A deer, a deer, a baby deer, what is it?

                    A fawn!

My grandma took us strawberry picking, and when we were older, my Grandpa taught us how fish (you'd better believe we bait our own hooks) and to row a rowboat or canoe. 

I've lost the details, but I have memory of Gramps Chamberlain's (Grandma's dad) story of getting lost on a hunting trip (likely with his sons Clyde and Harry) and falling asleep in an abandoned eagle's nest.  True perhaps but must consider the source. Unfortunately, any fishing lore is lost to (my) memory. He and Gram also helped look out for the widow across the street and her household of children, and my grandma would regale us with stories of how her dad would load both families into his car (over a dozen children between the two families, so perhaps a truck) and had before the trip bought enough watermelon and other melons for all. I know that they made ice cream at home, so perhaps brought that along.

My grandma and her cousin Helen were born only weeks apart and grew up next door to each other. They were the oldest, and when they were growing up their neighborhood was the end of town, Grandma & Helen would each take a potato from home, and some matches. They would go to the field at the end of their street and dig a small hole and cook their potatoes for a snack, and gaze up at the stars. I can just see their dark-haired heads bent together giggling and planning a new adventure.

Also, when Grandma and Helen were about 11 or 12, they spent a summer in Missouri, mostly on the farms of Uncle Minard & Uncle Ben. I'm sure they must have participated in farm chores, and perhaps a year earlier had traveled to another part of Missouri to visit Gramps Chamberlain's parents. Grandma remembers them as hillbillies who scarcely had a home, a shack with a dirt floor. For the life they led with the most minimal of comforts and exposure to the elements, they certainly lived a long life.

Prior to these tidbits of stories that have survived, Uncle Minard, Uncle Ben and almost every single relative of their generation and prior were all farmers, many hewing farms from the wilderness as my family moved from the original Colonies to Kentucky, Illinois and Missouri. In particular, Gramps Chamberlain's grandfather Henry died when Gramps was a teen, his cause of death listed as both skin cancer and face cancer. No doubt from a life lived behind a plow or on a horse. There are also stories of cousins in that family that drowned in the Ohio River and in the Mississippi, to say nothing of the known tornados or prairie fires that sometimes ravaged the area.

I have the utmost respect for those that both taught us about nature, and for those thatb came before them that were in close and daily contact with the land. I recently finished a book about gifts of the land, and I'm certainly grateful for the exposure I've had to the Great Outdoors.


2024 #52Ancestors, Week 29: Automobiles

Ah, the automobile.  We use it for mundane tasks like driving to work, hauling landscaping materials, and toting groceries.  Today, though, ...